Professional Learning Artefacts & Reflections
Showcasing professional growth, STAR model reflections, and classroom impact (2025)
Artefact 1
Positive Partnership
Autism Awareness Course
Artefact 2
Support Plan
for “Murray” Stage 5 student
Artefact 3
Extract from my critical literature review
(Wellbeing Course in Master of Education)
Artefact 2
Support Plan
for “Murray” Stage 5 student
|
SUPPORT PLAN |
|
| Diagnosis and Identified Concerns |
|
| Student Goals |
|
| Initial Considerations |
|
|
School Supports Whole school level |
|
| In Class – support / management |
|
| Family Supports and partnership |
|
| Student communication |
|
| External Supports |
|
|
Student is distressed or feels unsafe during recess or lunch breaks |
|
| Changes in Level of Risk |
|
A Stage 5 student in my support class presented with complex needs, including neurodivergence, ADHD, emotional dysregulation, and social vulnerability, compounded by recent trauma.
Despite mainstream placement, he was functioning at Stage 3 academically and displayed increasing distress and disengagement.
I was responsible for developing a comprehensive, Tiered Support Plan in line with school policies. The goal was to reduce risk, improve access to learning, and foster wellbeing through tailored adjustments, family collaboration, and cross-agency coordination.
I followed the school’s multi-tiered response framework to co-develop the support plan.
This included:
• conducting a needs assessment,
• liaising with external providers,
• documenting classroom, whole school, and family based supports,
• embedding trauma informed and strength based strategies, and
• creating a clear pathway for regular review.
Collaboration with the Learning Support Team, school leaders, and parents fulfilled Standard 3.7.2 and 7.3.2 (HIPL Element 2), as communication was strategic, sustained, and transparent. I also met Standard 6.4.2 by evaluating the effectiveness of the plan using observation, student feedback, and behaviour tracking (HIPL Element 5).
Through differentiated adjustments tailored to the student’s neurodivergence and wellbeing, I addressed Standards 1.5, 1.6, and 4.1 (HIPL Element 1). The plan’s structure and clarity allowed me to contribute strategies to peer discussions, demonstrating Standard 6.3 (HIPL Element 3: Collaborative and applied professional learning). Moving forward, I will adapt this multi-tiered model as a baseline for similar support needs, aligning with Standards 6.1 and 6.2 (HIPL Element 4) strengthening evidence informed, student centred practice.